Initial draft of a design document for the Zenodo like DOI per dandiset #2012
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
djarecka
reviewed
Sep 30, 2024
satra
reviewed
Jan 17, 2025
…ublished" draft version of dandiset
yarikoptic
commented
Jan 17, 2025
|
I created some test to simulate the workflow in dandi/dandi-schema#275 |
yarikoptic
commented
Mar 5, 2025
| - We might want a dedicated 404 page for deleted dandisets, or at least a message that the dandiset was deleted, and ideally describe the reason why it was deleted ("Upon request of maintainer", "Due to violation of terms of service", etc.) | ||
| - Then we adjust DOI record to point to that page. | ||
|
|
||
| - Should we do anything at dandischema level? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@djarecka we are to answer those I think before we could call this "done" ;-)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A design doc composed with @djarecka to avoid dummy DOIs for dandisets
refs:
Cite As#1932TODOs
but could already be checked out by @dandi/archive-maintainers folks since overall idea is formulated already and some early concerns/questions could already be asked/answered