removed txtSileOrca.no/info.no since it was never present

[zerothi]

@tfrederiksen I checked the tests, in none (of the two examples) are the number of basis functions present, will they ever be?
This PR suggests to remove the attribute if it will never be present?
If this is not the case, then please let me know. :)

• Changes documented in CHANGELOG.md

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.72%. Comparing base (296ace4) to head (4f22ee5).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #710   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.71%   86.72%           
=======================================
  Files         399      399           
  Lines       50659    50662    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        43931    43935    +4     
+ Misses       6728     6727    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tfrederiksen]

Indeed this info is not included in those two simple examples, but with other flags I've encountered the number of basis functions also in _property.txt. I can supply another example.

[zerothi]

ok, it would be great if we could have it in the tests.

If the no is not found, what should sisl do? Raise an error, issue a warning/info. If people need it, I would suspect raising an error would be appropriate?

[tfrederiksen]

ok, it would be great if we could have it in the tests.

OK, see zerothi/sisl-files#8

If the no is not found, what should sisl do? Raise an error, issue a warning/info. If people need it, I would suspect raising an error would be appropriate?

I agree, raising an error seems appropriate.

[zerothi]

Ok, will amend this pr

[zerothi]

Things should be fixed here.