-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
♻️ refactor parsing logic in qs.dart
for improved readability and efficiency
#29
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request refactors the logic in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant QS
participant Utils
Client->>QS: decode(queryString)
QS->>Utils: merge(_parseKeys(queryString))
Utils-->>QS: mergedObject
QS-->>Client: return mergedObject
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant QS
Client->>QS: encode(object, options)
QS->>QS: Determine type using switch expression
QS->>QS: Build output string using StringBuffer
QS->>QS: Call _encode with embedded comma logic & charset sentinel
QS-->>Client: return encoded string
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #29 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 97.38% 97.40% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 14 14
Lines 689 693 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 671 675 +4
Misses 18 18 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
lib/src/qs.dart (2)
49-57
: Elegant refactoring by removing the intermediate variable.This change elegantly eliminates an unnecessary intermediate variable by directly passing the result of
_parseKeys
toUtils.merge
. This improves code conciseness without sacrificing readability.
145-150
: Performance improvement using StringBuffer.Replacing string concatenation with StringBuffer is a performance best practice in Dart, especially when building strings incrementally. This change improves efficiency while maintaining clear intent.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
lib/src/qs.dart
(5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Test (chrome)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (5)
lib/src/qs.dart (5)
75-82
: Excellent use of switch expression pattern matching.The switch expression is a modern and more elegant approach compared to traditional if-else chains. This refactoring improves readability while also providing explicit typing for
obj
asMap<String, dynamic>
rather than the previous implicitdynamic
type, enhancing type safety.
107-109
: Good simplification of conditional logic.Combining two separate conditions with individual continue statements into a single condition with logical OR makes the code more concise and easier to follow.
117-120
: Clean removal of unnecessary variable.Eliminating the redundant
commaRoundTrip
variable and directly embedding its logic in the parameter list is a good simplification. Since the expression is used only once and remains readable inline, this change enhances code clarity.
152-161
: Elegant use of switch expression for charset handling.The switch expression here is more elegant and concise than nested if-else statements. The addition of a catch-all case with
_
ensures robustness, handling any unexpected charset values gracefully.
163-167
: Clear and concise string assembly logic.The condition to only append the joined string when it's not empty is explicit and clear. The final
toString()
call on the StringBuffer nicely completes the refactoring pattern.
This pull request includes several improvements to the
QS
class in thelib/src/qs.dart
file. The main focus of these changes is to enhance code readability and efficiency by refactoring existing code and simplifying logic.Code readability and efficiency improvements:
obj
, reducing unnecessary intermediate variables.obj
variable using aswitch
expression, making the code more concise and easier to understand.commaRoundTrip
variable and integrated its logic directly into the relevant method call.if
statement to streamline the code.StringBuffer
for building the query string, improving performance and readability.