Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First cut of making swixml 2 available via maven #3

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dscurrah
Copy link

@dscurrah dscurrah commented Mar 5, 2013

I am trying to have a build that will allow swixml to be distributed via maven.

This changeset moves the core source to a conventional maven structure and provides a pom file to manage the build.

@pau-minoves
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @swixml I would like to vote for this pull request to be accepted.

The library looks good but not being a maven artifact is a blocker for some. This would be very appreciated.

@swixml
Copy link
Owner

swixml commented Sep 5, 2013

At this point, I will not support maven related requests

Wolf Paulus
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)

On Monday, September 2, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Pau Minoves wrote:

Hi, @swixml (https://github.com/swixml) I would like to vote for this pull request to be accepted.
The library looks good but not being a maven artifact is a blocker for some. This would be very appreciated.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (#3 (comment)).

@pau-minoves
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your reply. Are you willing to let somebody else support it under the swixml project? Because the other options I see are fork or rewrite, which I would rather avoid.

@swixml
Copy link
Owner

swixml commented Sep 6, 2013

Goahead and implement it.

Wolf Paulus
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)

On Thursday, September 5, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Pau Minoves wrote:

Thanks for your reply. Are you willing to let somebody else support it under the swixml project? Because the other options I see are fork or rewrite, which I would rather avoid.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (#3 (comment)).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants