Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scaffolding and the first testcase for e2e evaluation tests #1225

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

nikg4
Copy link
Collaborator

@nikg4 nikg4 commented Jan 24, 2025

Description

-- Scaffolding and the first testcase for e2e evaluation tests
-- Refactor a couple of common helper utils used in e2e tests
-- Improve logging for OmegaConf merge errors

Related issues

Towards OPE-926, OPE-934

Before submitting

  • This PR only changes documentation. (You can ignore the following checks in that case)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline Pull Request guidelines?
  • Did you link the issue(s) related to this PR in the section above?
  • Did you add / update tests where needed?

Reviewers

At least one review from a member of oumi-ai/oumi-staff is required.

Copy link

linear bot commented Jan 24, 2025

OPE-926

@nikg4 nikg4 marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2025 02:55
Comment on lines +76 to +77
# Overriding nested fields using OmegaConf's dot-list syntax is complicated,
# or impossible. Let's just create a modified config copy instead.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should probably log a bug for this. If we're struggling with it, users definitely will too.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

linear bot commented Jan 24, 2025

OPE-934

@nikg4 nikg4 merged commit 3b7e07c into main Jan 24, 2025
2 checks passed
@nikg4 nikg4 deleted the xrdaukar/it-eval-test branch January 24, 2025 03:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants