Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add crictl update --oom-score-adj flag #1781

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

We have not used the value for the container update since now, which is now being added for feature completeness.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

@kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools-maintainers

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Added `crictl update --oom-score-adj` flag.

We have not used the value for the container update since now, which is
now being added for feature completeness.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 25, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 25, 2025
@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

Is it a revert of of #279?

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Feb 27, 2025

Is it a revert of of #279?

Oh, yes. I'm wondering why we should not have flags for mainly all available runtime update fields. There are also others missing:

https://github.com/kubernetes/cri-api/blob/3dd84b8b2b65ecdf2087863f2e028266cfa46dcb/pkg/apis/runtime/v1/api.proto#L849-L855

There are also other runtimes like crun and youki. 🤔

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

There are also other runtimes like crun and youki. 🤔

I am not sure what is the right way to do here. Did you want it for completeness? Or some scenario is missing?

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link

From perspective of Node Resource Hot Plug KEP, where we are planning to utilize UpdateContainerResources CRI API to update the running container with updated oom_score_adj and swap limit (already supported), We would like to have this feature added and later integrate it with UpdateContainerResources CRI API so we will be able to update the oom_score_adj for container. Thanks.

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

From perspective of Node Resource Hot Plug KEP, where we are planning to utilize UpdateContainerResources CRI API to update the running container with updated oom_score_adj and swap limit (already supported), We would like to have this feature added and later integrate it with UpdateContainerResources CRI API so we will be able to update the oom_score_adj for container. Thanks.

/lgtm

I guess we will be ok to return error if not supported on some runtimes

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 281549d into kubernetes-sigs:master Mar 5, 2025
36 checks passed
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link

From perspective of Node Resource Hot Plug KEP, where we are planning to utilize UpdateContainerResources CRI API to update the running container with updated oom_score_adj and swap limit (already supported), We would like to have this feature added and later integrate it with UpdateContainerResources CRI API so we will be able to update the oom_score_adj for container. Thanks.

/lgtm

I guess we will be ok to return error if not supported on some runtimes

Yeah, Thank you.

@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the oom-kill-update branch March 6, 2025 07:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants