Use a <- v instead of a = append(a, v)

[xushiwei]

Proposal

In Go:

a = append(a, v)
a = append(a, v1, v2, v3)
a = append(a, b...)

In Go+:

a <- v
a <- v1, v2, v3
a <- b...

Easier to understand.

[akofer]

but in a 'for loop' statement, the syntax 'a <- v' means 'a' will iterate through each element of v, which can be a little confusing if we reuse '<-' to replace a slice 'append()'.

proposal: it might be better to use 'for a in v' instead of 'for a <- v'.

[xushiwei]

but in a 'for loop' statement, the syntax 'a <- v' means 'a' will iterate through each element of v, which can be a little confusing if we reuse '<-' to replace a slice 'append()'.

proposal: it might be better to use 'for a in v' instead of 'for a <- v'.

Related issue: #295 (reopened)

[xushiwei]

but in a 'for loop' statement, the syntax 'a <- v' means 'a' will iterate through each element of v, which can be a little confusing if we reuse '<-' to replace a slice 'append()'.

proposal: it might be better to use 'for a in v' instead of 'for a <- v'.

supported in #2166