Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: CI/CD integration tests fixed #4068

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025

Conversation

Samarthsinghal28
Copy link

@Samarthsinghal28 Samarthsinghal28 commented Mar 25, 2025

Relates to

Ticket URL: Sifchain#397

Risks

Low – Changes affect CI/CD automation and test environment files, but no core functionality.

Background

What does this PR do?

  • Fixes jsdoc-automation.yml to ensure proper CI/CD workflow execution.
  • Removes environment.test.ts, as it is no longer needed.

Why was environment.test.ts removed?

  • environment.test.ts was testing environment.ts, but this file does not exist in the repository.
  • I verified using the main branch that environment.ts is not needed since no functions from this file are being used in the project.

What kind of change is this?

  • Bug fixes (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Improvements (misc. changes to existing features)
  • Features (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Updates (new versions of included code)

Documentation changes needed?

  • My changes do not require a change to the project documentation.
  • My changes require a change to the project documentation.

Testing

Where should a reviewer start?

  1. Review the updates in jsdoc-automation.yml to ensure proper configuration.
  2. Confirm that environment.test.ts is unnecessary by checking the main branch.

Detailed testing steps

  1. Verify that the CI/CD pipeline (jsdoc-automation.yml) runs successfully.
  2. Ensure that no dependencies rely on environment.test.ts.

Test Results:

Output

  • The script was failing locally with exit code 1 because there were no PRs to document.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Collaborator

@monilpat monilpat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall the changes make sense for the additional steps not understanding why we are changing the access token though so going to send this back feel free to address this comment then can approve

Copy link
Collaborator

@monilpat monilpat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - let's merge this in and monitor future PRs to make sure that the jsdoc generation is working as expected

@lalalune lalalune merged commit 8f4649f into elizaOS:v2-develop Mar 26, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants