added initial tests for agents in the-org

[Y4NK33420]

Relates to

https://github.com/Sifchain/issues/397

Risks

Low - The changes are focused on test infrastructure and don't affect production code. The main risk is that some tests might fail in specific environments due to timing or process management issues.

Background

What does this PR do?

This PR implements an initial test suite for the ElizaOS agent system, establishing the foundation for future robust testing. The current implementation includes:

1. A basic test setup infrastructure with mock services
2. Initial social media manager agent tests
3. Basic structure for other agent-specific tests (Ruby, Project Manager, Investment Manager, Dev Rel, Community Manager)

Note: This is a draft PR with initial test implementations. The tests will be enhanced with more comprehensive scenarios, better error handling, and real-world use cases in future updates.

What kind of change is this?

Improvements (misc. changes to existing features) - This PR adds initial test coverage for existing functionality without changing the core behavior.

Documentation changes needed?

My changes do not require a change to the project documentation.

Testing

Where should a reviewer start?

Reviewers should start by examining the test files in the eliza/packages/the-org/tests/ directory:

1. setup.ts - Basic test infrastructure and mock services
2. social-media-manager.test.ts - Initial social media manager agent tests
3. Other agent-specific test files

Detailed testing steps

1. Test Setup Infrastructure:

   • Run bun test tests/setup.ts
   • Verify basic mock scenario service functionality
   • Test message creation and user setup utilities
   • Verify runtime creation and cleanup

2. Social Media Manager Tests:

   • Run bun test tests/social-media-manager.test.ts
   • Test basic content creation requests
   • Test basic scheduling functionality
   • Test basic cross-platform campaign strategy
   • Test basic analytics interpretation
   • Test basic crisis communication
   • Test basic influencer collaboration

3. Other Agent Tests:

   • Run tests for each agent type:

     bun test tests/ruby.test.ts
     bun test tests/project-manager.test.ts
     bun test tests/investment-manager.test.ts
     bun test tests/dev-rel.test.ts
     bun test tests/community-manager.test.ts

Database changes

None - These tests use mock services and don't affect the database.

Deployment instructions

No special deployment instructions needed. The tests can be run locally using:

cd eliza/packages/the-org
bun test

Future Improvements

The current test suite is a foundation that will be enhanced in future updates with:

1. More comprehensive test scenarios
2. Better error handling and edge cases
3. Real-world use cases and integration tests
4. Performance testing and benchmarks
5. More detailed assertions and validations
6. Better mock implementations for external services
7. Automated test data generation
8. Test coverage reporting and analysis

The current implementation provides a basic structure that can be built upon, focusing on establishing patterns and practices for future test development.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[monilpat]

Overall the test structure makes sense to me would be curious to see the output of the tests to see what is passing and what is failing but imagine you are working through the failures now which is why it is in a draft state

[monilpat]

can we add a test for test:org that runs all the tests in the org repo as well?

[Y4NK33420]

Yeah the current structure includes use of mock implementations in few places which needs to be replaced with the actual class, but had some issues with them, will look into them and update the status.