Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update hintable dep to 1.2.x #851

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2021
Merged

Update hintable dep to 1.2.x #851

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2021

Conversation

mvorisek
Copy link
Member

@mvorisek mvorisek commented Apr 15, 2021

now we also allow only 1.2.* instead of 1.*

Copy link
Collaborator

@georgehristov georgehristov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mvorisek
Copy link
Member Author

mvorisek commented Apr 15, 2021

@georgehristov any idea how to fix https://github.com/mvorisek/atk4-hintable-mirror/blob/develop/tests/Data/HintableModelTest.php#L102 ? (related with references and scopes)

currently it requires persistence set before ref() can be even returned

@mvorisek mvorisek merged commit b08661f into develop Apr 15, 2021
@mvorisek mvorisek deleted the update_hintable_dep branch April 15, 2021 13:23
@georgehristov
Copy link
Collaborator

@ghristov#5652 any idea how to fix https://github.com/mvorisek/atk4-hintable-mirror/blob/develop/tests/Data/HintableModelTest.php#L102 ? (related with references and scopes)

currently it requires persistence set before ref() can be even returned

@mvorisek you referenced somebody else :)

Anyway I will have a look

@mvorisek
Copy link
Member Author

mvorisek commented Apr 16, 2021

@georgehristov did you find a solution?

update: link with fixed version/commit is: https://github.com/mvorisek/atk4-hintable-mirror/blob/1.2.1/tests/Data/HintableModelTest.php#L100

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants