Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 0.3.11 #434

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2017
Merged

Release 0.3.11 #434

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2017

Conversation

nomisRev
Copy link
Member

@nomisRev nomisRev commented Oct 31, 2017

Notes

  • Instances for Eval
  • Iso instances
  • Improved kategory processor (Iso, higherkind & instance)
  • Eq instances
  • Validated fixes
  • Corrected Semigroup & Monoid API

@nomisRev nomisRev requested a review from pablisco October 31, 2017 13:24
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@203b880). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #434   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   37.81%           
  Complexity        ?      311           
=========================================
  Files             ?      173           
  Lines             ?     4792           
  Branches          ?      515           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     1812           
  Misses            ?     2829           
  Partials          ?      151

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 203b880...1ffe648. Read the comment docs.

@nomisRev nomisRev merged commit 5c41bd4 into master Oct 31, 2017
@nomisRev nomisRev deleted the release-0.3.11 branch October 31, 2017 14:01
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Package definitions
GROUP=io.kategory
VERSION_NAME=0.3.11-SNAPSHOT
VERSION_NAME=0.3.11
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we bring it back to a SNAPSHOT version so it stays like that in master?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants