Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

链接之后的文字被转义了 #370

Closed
Miuzarte opened this issue Nov 6, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

链接之后的文字被转义了 #370

Miuzarte opened this issue Nov 6, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Miuzarte
Copy link

Miuzarte commented Nov 6, 2022 •
edited
Loading

B站抽风又推送了旧动态
然后链接之后的文字是被转义了？？
推送、识别获取输出都会这样
另外可以考虑在输出的开头加入发布时间，再直接点直接无视旧动态
6413ab46af97ab04.png
Screenshot_2022-11-07-02-01-57-193_idm.internet.download.manager.plus.jpg
@Tsuk1ko Tsuk1ko added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 7, 2022
@Tsuk1ko Tsuk1ko closed this as completed in 5d64bd3 Nov 7, 2022
Tsuk1ko added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2022
@Tsuk1ko
fix: 偶然的重复推送
cb413ad 
fix #370
@Miuzarte
Copy link
Author

Miuzarte commented Dec 7, 2022

有个新问题，审核太久的动态会被判成旧动态重推送

@Tsuk1ko
Copy link
Owner

Tsuk1ko commented Dec 7, 2022

有个新问题，审核太久的动态会被判成旧动态重推送

有没有例子

@Miuzarte
Copy link
Author

Miuzarte commented Dec 7, 2022 •
edited
Loading

有个新问题，审核太久的动态会被判成旧动态重推送

有没有例子

https://t.bilibili.com/736497070788050967?share_source=copy_link&share_medium=android
Stitch_20221208_070752.png

https://t.bilibili.com/736940075203428357?share_source=copy_link&share_medium=android
Stitch_20221208_070802.png

@Miuzarte
Copy link
Author

Miuzarte commented Dec 7, 2022 •
edited
Loading

图大点 里面的字多点应该大概率能延长审核时间，要测试的话
也不是，九张没字的图也能给我卡几小时

原话好像有点歧义（
有个新问题，审核太久后发出来的动态，发布时间仍是审核前的发送时间，会被判定为旧动态被过滤掉

@Tsuk1ko
Copy link
Owner

Tsuk1ko commented Dec 11, 2022

要不放宽点判定时间好了，12小时之前的才过滤掉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Tsuk1ko @Miuzarte