-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
next attribute not working with test attribute in first recv #103
Comments
wdoekes
referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2014
Now you can do this to test a different sipp version: SIPP=/home/walter/src/sipp-3.2/sipp ./regress/runtests SIPP=/home/walter/src/sipp-3.2/sipp ./regress/github-#0103/run
wdoekes
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2014
Reported by: Kovács Bálint Git bisect against this test says: $ git bisect bad 302b2f8 is the first bad commit commit 302b2f8 Author: Rob Day <[email protected]> Date: Fri Feb 15 00:43:41 2013 +0000 Fixing errors when compiling with -Wall -Wextra git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/sipp/code/sipp/trunk@629 \ 60913f6b-29f6-41b8-8391-1ad2d2d6c344
wdoekes
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2014
The gcc -Wall warning about missing parentheses was fixed by adding them around the wrong operators. After this changeset, the next parameter works like it should again. Reported by: Kovács Bálint (@kovacsbalu) Closes: github-#103.
Please try #105. |
Perfect, thank you! |
Sorry, there is a mistake in my bug report. Sipp should not jump to label, because var is not set. |
wdoekes
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2014
Reported by: Kovács Bálint Git bisect against this test says: $ git bisect bad 302b2f8 is the first bad commit commit 302b2f8 Author: Rob Day <[email protected]> Date: Fri Feb 15 00:43:41 2013 +0000 Fixing errors when compiling with -Wall -Wextra git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/sipp/code/sipp/trunk@629 \ 60913f6b-29f6-41b8-8391-1ad2d2d6c344
wdoekes
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2014
The gcc -Wall warning about missing parentheses was fixed by adding them around the wrong operators. After this changeset, the next parameter works like it should again. Reported by: Kovács Bálint (@kovacsbalu) Closes: github-#103.
Thanks for testing. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Modify basic uas scenario with
and put
between 183 and 200.
UAS: sipp -i 127.0.0.1 -sf modified_uas.xml -m 1
UAC: sipp 127.0.0.1:5060 -sn uac -i 127.0.0.1 -m 1
Sipp should continue the scenario flow.
Sipp 3.4.1 also has this problem, works correctly with 3.2
This was useful for testing call queues when you feed var from csv file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: