Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove fileshare logs #1814

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Remove fileshare logs #1814

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

esimkowitz
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to logging mechanisms in two different Go packages: pkg/remote/fileshare/fileshare.go and pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go. In the fileshare.go file, multiple logging statements were removed from various functions, reducing the verbosity of log output across file share operations such as reading, listing, creating, and manipulating files.

In the wshremote.go file, a new conditional logging function logPrintfDev was added, which enables logging only when the application is in development mode. This function replaces direct log.Printf calls in several server implementation methods, providing a more controlled approach to logging. The changes modify the logging approach without altering the core functionality or error handling of the existing code.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go (3)

337-337: Consider adding file size to copy operation logs.

While the current logs are helpful, adding file sizes would provide better visibility into the scope of copy operations.

-logPrintfDev("copying %q to %q\n", srcUri, destUri)
+logPrintfDev("copying %q (%d bytes) to %q\n", srcUri, srcInfo.Size(), destUri)

Also applies to: 343-343


Line range hint 1-808: Standardize logging approach across the file.

Some functions still use direct log.Printf calls (e.g., line 309: log.Printf("RemoteTarStreamCommand: path=%s\n", path)). Consider replacing all debug logging with logPrintfDev for consistency.


Line range hint 1-808: Consider sanitizing sensitive information in logs.

File paths in logs might contain sensitive information. Consider implementing path sanitization for logs to mask sensitive parts of paths (e.g., usernames in home directories).

Example implementation:

func sanitizePath(path string) string {
    // Mask username in home directory paths
    home := os.Getenv("HOME")
    if strings.HasPrefix(path, home) {
        return strings.Replace(path, home, "~/", 1)
    }
    return path
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2304b8b and e8bb3d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pkg/remote/fileshare/fileshare.go (0 hunks)
  • pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go (10 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • pkg/remote/fileshare/fileshare.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: Build for TestDriver.ai
🔇 Additional comments (5)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go (5)

804-808: LGTM! Good practice to conditionally log based on environment.

The new logPrintfDev function effectively gates logging behind a development mode check, which helps reduce noise in production logs.


108-108: LGTM! Helpful debug logs for chunked operations.

The logs provide good visibility into the chunking process during development.

Also applies to: 114-114


257-257: LGTM! Comprehensive logging for tar stream operations.

The logs provide good coverage of the tar stream lifecycle and progress.

Also applies to: 259-259, 291-291, 300-300, 302-302


657-657: LGTM! Good progression logging for move operations.

The logs provide clear visibility into each step of the move operation.

Also applies to: 683-683, 688-688, 690-690, 692-692


779-779: LGTM! Comprehensive write operation logging.

The log includes all essential information (bytes written, file path, offset) for debugging write operations.

@esimkowitz esimkowitz merged commit 965ed28 into main Jan 23, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@esimkowitz esimkowitz deleted the evan/fileshare-logs branch January 23, 2025 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant