Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPVE-386: feat: added the optionalPaths device selector field #364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2023

Conversation

jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 17, 2023
@jeff-roche jeff-roche changed the title feat: added the optionalPaths device selector field OCPVE-386: feat: added the optionalPaths device selector field Jul 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 17, 2023

@jeff-roche: This pull request references OCPVE-386 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from qJkee and suleymanakbas91 July 17, 2023 18:00
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 17, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jeff-roche

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 17, 2023
@jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold for review
/cc @brandisher @qJkee

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from brandisher July 17, 2023 18:01
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 17, 2023
@jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor Author

Validated the e2e tests are running successfully manually

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #364 (2ded83c) into main (f444ae9) will increase coverage by 1.05%.
The diff coverage is 42.55%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #364      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   14.38%   15.44%   +1.05%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        1932     1988      +56     
==========================================
+ Hits          278      307      +29     
- Misses       1630     1657      +27     
  Partials       24       24              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
api/v1alpha1/lvmcluster_types.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
api/v1alpha1/lvmcluster_webhook.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/vgmanager/devices.go 72.64% <95.23%> (+9.72%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@brandisher brandisher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall this lgtm. The approach makes sense and there are some simple/clever bits of code that satisfy the use case. My feedback is mostly non-blocking suggestions and a couple of questions. I like the consolidation of certain aspects like validateDeviceSelectorPaths().

Putting a hold on for another review.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 19, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 19, 2023
@qJkee
Copy link
Contributor

qJkee commented Jul 19, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 19, 2023
@jeff-roche
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold
/override ci/prow/lvm-operator-bundle-e2e-aws

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 19, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 19, 2023

@jeff-roche: Overrode contexts on behalf of jeff-roche: ci/prow/lvm-operator-bundle-e2e-aws

In response to this:

/unhold
/override ci/prow/lvm-operator-bundle-e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 19, 2023

@jeff-roche: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jeff-roche jeff-roche merged commit 23224b7 into openshift:main Jul 19, 2023
@jeff-roche jeff-roche deleted the optionalPaths branch July 19, 2023 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants