-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPVE-386: feat: added the optionalPaths device selector field #364
Conversation
@jeff-roche: This pull request references OCPVE-386 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jeff-roche The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold for review |
Validated the e2e tests are running successfully manually |
29488a3
to
2ded83c
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #364 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 14.38% 15.44% +1.05%
==========================================
Files 23 23
Lines 1932 1988 +56
==========================================
+ Hits 278 307 +29
- Misses 1630 1657 +27
Partials 24 24
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this lgtm. The approach makes sense and there are some simple/clever bits of code that satisfy the use case. My feedback is mostly non-blocking suggestions and a couple of questions. I like the consolidation of certain aspects like validateDeviceSelectorPaths()
.
Putting a hold on for another review.
/lgtm
/hold
32934a0
to
b2a02a2
Compare
/lgtm |
/unhold |
@jeff-roche: Overrode contexts on behalf of jeff-roche: ci/prow/lvm-operator-bundle-e2e-aws In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@jeff-roche: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
No description provided.