Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cleanup: remove a TODO that has been take care of #7855

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 0 additions & 22 deletions rpc_util.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -877,28 +877,6 @@ func decompress(compressor encoding.Compressor, d mem.BufferSlice, maxReceiveMes
return nil, 0, err
}

// TODO: Can/should this still be preserved with the new BufferSlice API? Are
// there any actual benefits to allocating a single large buffer instead of
// multiple smaller ones?
//if sizer, ok := compressor.(interface {
// DecompressedSize(compressedBytes []byte) int
//}); ok {
// if size := sizer.DecompressedSize(d); size >= 0 {
// if size > maxReceiveMessageSize {
// return nil, size, nil
// }
// // size is used as an estimate to size the buffer, but we
// // will read more data if available.
// // +MinRead so ReadFrom will not reallocate if size is correct.
// //
// // TODO: If we ensure that the buffer size is the same as the DecompressedSize,
// // we can also utilize the recv buffer pool here.
// buf := bytes.NewBuffer(make([]byte, 0, size+bytes.MinRead))
// bytesRead, err := buf.ReadFrom(io.LimitReader(dcReader, int64(maxReceiveMessageSize)+1))
// return buf.Bytes(), int(bytesRead), err
// }
//}

out, err := mem.ReadAll(io.LimitReader(dcReader, int64(maxReceiveMessageSize)+1), pool)
if err != nil {
out.Free()
Expand Down