Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorg docs #225

Open
david26694 opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Reorg docs #225

david26694 opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@david26694
Copy link
Owner

This is not the best structure, since the use-cases have grown:

Image
@luizhsuperti
Copy link

luizhsuperti commented Feb 26, 2025

Proposal for Documentation Reorganization

Hey everyone!
I was thinking about reorganizing the documentation to improve clarity and usability. Here’s the proposed structure:

  • Home (README)
  • Quickstart (Installation + Package Overview: Splitter, Perturbator, and Analysis classes)
  • Documentation (APIs, details on classes and methods)
  • Usage Examples (Notebooks with practical examples)
  • Contribution (Guidelines for contributing)

In my fork,
👉 I revamped the README to be more appealing to a broader audience.
I also modified the Quickstart section to align with this idea and the proposal above.

I’d love your feedback on whether the Quickstart section information is accurate—I’m still new to the package, so there might be some errors in definitions or concepts. (The Python notebooks currently in the docs are safe and should still be included in some form.)

For inspiration, I looked at the documentation structures of:

Ambrosia
pysurvival

  • Why This Change?
    • Makes it easier for new users to navigate and understand the package.
    • Provides a clearer structure for future contributors.
    • The examples section can be refined over time for better clarity and accuracy.
    • In the future, we could also add a "Stats 101" section for foundational concepts.

Let me know what you think!

Image Image Image

@david26694 @ludovico-lanni

@david26694
Copy link
Owner Author

david26694 commented Feb 28, 2025

thanks @luizhsuperti , can you open a PR? and we can discuss in there

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants