Run dandi-cli tests with dandi-api image built with local version of dandischema

[jwodder]

Closes #62.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #63 (b38c8a4) into master (3f30ea5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #63   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.07%   96.07%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1274     1274           
=======================================
  Hits         1224     1224           
  Misses         50       50           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	96.07% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3f30ea5...b38c8a4. Read the comment docs.

[yarikoptic]

Wow CI is so green! The only fail is on windows:

_________ test_dandimeta_datacite[additional_meta2-datacite_checks2] __________
dandischema\tests\test_datacite.py:300: in test_dandimeta_datacite
    datacite_post(datacite, meta_dict["doi"])
dandischema\tests\test_datacite.py:28: in datacite_post
    rp.raise_for_status()
C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python\3.9.6\x64\lib\site-packages\requests\models.py:953: in raise_for_status
    raise HTTPError(http_error_msg, response=self)
E   requests.exceptions.HTTPError: 422 Client Error: Unprocessable Entity for url: https://api.test.datacite.org/dois

----------- coverage: platform win32, python 3.9.6-final-0 -----------
Coverage XML written to file coverage.xml

which I will rerun to see if it was a fluke or something in composition of the request to datacite on windows somehow "flips it"?

[yarikoptic]

and now it is green -- so was some fluke... we might need to guard against it or figure out what it is really if it reemerges. Let's proceed!