Avoid return type when method does not return

[szepeviktor]

I don't really know what I'm doing but return tag and return type should not be present when the method does not return anything.

PR checklist

• Read the contribution guidelines.
• Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
• Run the following to build the project and update samples:

  ./mvnw clean package || exit
  ./bin/generate-samples.sh ./bin/configs/*.yaml || exit
  ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh || exit
  

  (For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH)
  Commit all changed files.
  This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
  These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
  You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
  IMPORTANT: Do NOT purge/delete any folders/files (e.g. tests) when regenerating the samples as manually written tests may be removed.
• File the PR against the correct branch: master (upcoming 7.x.0 minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks), 8.0.x (breaking changes without fallbacks)
• If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

[wing328]

the change makes sense to me

can you please update the samples to fix https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/actions/runs/13258449446/job/37009641140?pr=20639 ?

thanks for the PR

[szepeviktor]

Done 🍏

[szepeviktor]

Seems like the return type was left there to have "void".
But we have https://github.com/conedevelopment/billingo-php/blob/0504445fd3f060dedcb36ec0b7b1e04d12ca26c5/src/Api/BankAccountApi.php#L714-L721

[wing328]

cc @juanavilactn as well

shall we keep the : void in the method signature?

[wing328]

maybe we should keep it as seems like that's what the php community prefers: https://stackoverflow.com/a/33671413

[szepeviktor]

Please note we get this: return type without return statement: https://github.com/conedevelopment/billingo-php/blob/0504445fd3f060dedcb36ec0b7b1e04d12ca26c5/src/Api/BankAccountApi.php#L714-L721

[wing328]

ah ok. looks like a different issue ...

i'll take a further look

[wing328]

in other languages such as java, the doc is also completely omitted if it's void so make senses php follows the same.

[wing328]

cc
@jebentier (2017/07), @dkarlovi (2017/07), @mandrean (2017/08), @jfastnacht (2017/09), @ybelenko (2018/07), @renepardon (2018/12)