Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[12.0][FIX] l10n_es_aeat_mod303: New BOE format 2025 #4049

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 12.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Berezi
Copy link

@Berezi Berezi commented Feb 26, 2025

In fact, the changes are very small for the implemented things, as the changes on the REAGP, which are the biggest, are not implemented. We just need to force to 0 the percentages for the ephemeral taxes. They just can ignore that fields for not bothering people...

There's also a move for "Recargo equivalencia 0.5%" from 16-18 to 168-170 inadvertently.

In fact, the changes are very small for the implemented things, as
the changes on the REAGP, which are the biggest, are not implemented.
We just need to force to 0 the percentages for the ephemeral taxes.
They just can ignore that fields for not bothering people...

There's also a move for "Recargo equivalencia 0.5%" from 16-18 to
168-170 inadvertently.
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 12.0 milestone Feb 26, 2025
@Berezi Berezi force-pushed the 12.0-imp-l10n_es_aeat_mod303 branch from fc1f1b1 to e41aceb Compare February 26, 2025 09:24
In fact, the changes are very small for the implemented things, as
the changes on the REAGP, which are the biggest, are not implemented.
We just need to force to 0 the percentages for the ephemeral taxes.
They just can ignore that fields for not bothering people...

There's also a move for "Recargo equivalencia 0.5%" from 16-18 to
168-170 inadvertently.
@Berezi Berezi force-pushed the 12.0-imp-l10n_es_aeat_mod303 branch from e41aceb to c4b31d4 Compare February 26, 2025 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants