You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi team, the flow in 'System Manager' and 'CLI' do not correspond in this article. The System Manager flow lacks the 'Protect a volume' option. The option described (which is called "Lock the destination snapshots" by the way) is only available in the 'Protect' GUI option. So when creating a SnapMirror relationship. Not when creating a volume?
It furthermore lacks the instruction on which cluster (source or destination) this should be done.
Please revisit this page, because it's wrong. See attach for the option at the end of a SnapMirror Creation wizard. The option 'Lock the destination snapshots' is available both when using a 'vault' type and a 'mirror-vault' type relationship. The choice which locking mechanism is only available when using a 'vault' relationship though.
Public issues must not contain sensitive information
This issue contains no sensitive information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Page URL
https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap/snaplock/commit-snapshot-copies-worm-concept.html
Page title
Commit snapshots to WORM on a vault destination
Summary
Hi team, the flow in 'System Manager' and 'CLI' do not correspond in this article. The System Manager flow lacks the 'Protect a volume' option. The option described (which is called "Lock the destination snapshots" by the way) is only available in the 'Protect' GUI option. So when creating a SnapMirror relationship. Not when creating a volume?
It furthermore lacks the instruction on which cluster (source or destination) this should be done.
Please revisit this page, because it's wrong. See attach for the option at the end of a SnapMirror Creation wizard. The option 'Lock the destination snapshots' is available both when using a 'vault' type and a 'mirror-vault' type relationship. The choice which locking mechanism is only available when using a 'vault' relationship though.
Public issues must not contain sensitive information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: