Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(docs): update UMA config doc #9108

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 5, 2024
Merged

fix(docs): update UMA config doc #9108

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 5, 2024

Conversation

ossdhaval
Copy link
Contributor

Prepare


Description

Target issue

closes #issue-number-here

Implementation Details


Test and Document the changes

  • Static code analysis has been run locally and issues have been fixed
  • Relevant unit and integration tests have been added/updated
  • Relevant documentation has been updated if any (i.e. user guides, installation and configuration guides, technical design docs etc)

Please check the below before submitting your PR. The PR will not be merged if there are no commits that start with docs: to indicate documentation changes or if the below checklist is not selected.

  • I confirm that there is no impact on the docs due to the code changes in this PR.

@ossdhaval ossdhaval requested a review from manojs1978 August 5, 2024 06:13
@ossdhaval ossdhaval self-assigned this Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented Aug 5, 2024

DryRun Security Summary

The pull request changes the configuration of UMA (User-Managed Access) resources in the Janssen Server, demonstrating the use of the Janssen CLI to manage these resources, and the documentation should emphasize the importance of following security best practices to ensure the security and integrity of the UMA resource management functionality.

Expand for full summary

Summary:

The code changes in this pull request are related to the configuration of UMA (User-Managed Access) resources in the Janssen Server. The changes demonstrate the use of the Janssen CLI to perform various operations on UMA resources, such as creating, updating, deleting, and retrieving them. From an application security perspective, it is important to ensure that the Janssen Server's implementation of UMA resource management adheres to best practices to mitigate potential risks and vulnerabilities. Key areas of focus include access control, input validation, least privilege, logging and auditing, and secure communication.

Files Changed:

  • docs/admin/config-guide/auth-server-config/oauth-umaresources-config.md: This file contains documentation on the configuration of UMA resources in the Janssen Server. The code changes provide examples of using the Janssen CLI to manage UMA resources, which should be reviewed to ensure that the implementation follows security best practices. Specifically, the documentation should emphasize the importance of proper access control, input validation, least privilege, logging and auditing, and secure communication to maintain the security and integrity of the UMA resource management functionality.

Code Analysis

We ran 9 analyzers against 1 file and 0 analyzers had findings. 9 analyzers had no findings.

Riskiness

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

View PR in the DryRun Dashboard.

@mo-auto mo-auto added area-documentation Documentation needs to change as part of issue or PR kind-bug Issue or PR is a bug in existing functionality labels Aug 5, 2024
@mo-auto mo-auto enabled auto-merge (squash) August 5, 2024 06:20
@mo-auto mo-auto merged commit 397494a into main Aug 5, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@mo-auto mo-auto deleted the doc-uma-resources branch August 5, 2024 08:09
yuriyz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Signed-off-by: ossdhaval <[email protected]>
Former-commit-id: 397494a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-documentation Documentation needs to change as part of issue or PR kind-bug Issue or PR is a bug in existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants