You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
When retrieving the overlap matrix from GQCP in the cc-pvdz basis set, the resulting overlap matrix does not look as expected. It does not have ones on the diagonal.
Other basis sets (STO-3G, 6-31G,...) do not have this issue as far as we know.
Current tests are only implemented for STO-3G and 6-31G. There is a discrepancy between the cc-pVDZ basis set included in the version of Libint included in the Docker container (see /usr/local/miniconda3/share/libint/2.6.0/basis/cc-pvdz.g94 (which is the same as the one used by Psi4))
H 0
S 3 1.00
13.0100000 0.0196850
1.9620000 0.1379770
0.4446000 0.4781480
S 1 1.00
0.1220000 1.0000000
P 1 1.00
0.7270000 1.0000000
and the current EMSL basis set:
H 0
S 4 1.00
13.0100000 0.0196850
1.9620000 0.1379770
0.4446000 0.4781480
0.1220000 0.5012400
S 1 1.00
0.1220000 1.0000000
P 1 1.00
0.7270000 1.0000000
Using the latter basis set leads to ones along the diagonal, but to differing values off-diagonal.
Describe the bug
When retrieving the overlap matrix from GQCP in the cc-pvdz basis set, the resulting overlap matrix does not look as expected. It does not have ones on the diagonal.
Other basis sets (STO-3G, 6-31G,...) do not have this issue as far as we know.
To Reproduce
H2 ccpvdz Overlap.txt
Expected behavior

We expect the overlap matrix to look like this (bohr):
Ångstrom looks like this:

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: