feat(pack)!: Split python pack into python and python-ruff

[Uzaaft]

Closes #592

[github-actions]

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

• If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

• If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

• Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

• README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

• Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

[Uzaaft]

This is tentatively ready to come out of draft. @AstroNvim/astrocommunity-maintainers Wanna review?

[mehalter]

Shouldn't the python-ruff pack just import the python pack and then add ruff-lsp? Wouldn't reduce lots of duplicate code

[Uzaaft]

Shouldn't the python-ruff pack just import the python pack and then add ruff-lsp? Wouldn't reduce lots of duplicate code

I could do that :)

[Uzaaft]

Shouldn't the python-ruff pack just import the python pack and then add ruff-lsp? Wouldn't reduce lots of duplicate code

So the python pack ends up using stuff such as black and isort, which we dont need in the ruff pack

[m-rutter]

@mehalter

The primary point in splitting it is not because people don't want Ruff (though that is a faction), but because isort is made redundant by ruff and because the current config somehow messes up the formatting of imports when they are both present (formatting in the wrong order potentially)

So to reuse we would want to be able to remove isort from the python pack at the point of importing it into the ruff pack, which might be unexpected because the user might expect packs to be accumlative.

[Uzaaft]

The primary point in splitting it is not because people don't want Ruff (though that is a faction), but because isort is made redundant by ruff and because the current config somehow messes up the formatting of imports when they are both present (formatting in the wrong order potentially)

Thanks for re-iterating my point.

[mehalter]

LGTM