-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
f3probe false negative #226
Comments
I found similar issue #219 and I'm running f3write on it |
Once you post the outputs of |
Well, using those tools, I confirmed that the USB drive can hold at least 256 GB of data with no loss. I'm actually thinking this USB drive is genuine now. It seems likely that I got my hands on a genuine Sandisk 1TB USB-C drive. It has this serial code SDDDC3 on it, which also applies to other sizes of the same type of device. https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Ultra-Drive-Type-C-Flash/dp/B0CKJB51M8 |
Time to close this ticket, then? |
I bought some USB-A + USB-C drive from a discount store that sells random junk including scam flash drives. It said SanDisk on it so I took a chance, even though I knew scammers can print the name of a reputable brand on the drive.
The whole is the same width as the USB-A male port. I looked at it, and my heart sunk when it said 1 TB. There's no way this disk could hold 1 TB.
I ran f3probe on it to see what the real size was. It was taking a long time, so I just let it run in the background.
Later I come back and f3probe claims it holds the entire 1 TB!
I stared at my screen and shouted "Bullshit!" several times.
How did this drive fool f3?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: